Rachel Laudan

What are regional cuisines? Reflections on Hawaii and other places

How Mainland Food Looks to a Hungry Person from Hawaii. From Pupus to da Maxx.

“We don’t want generic Mexican cuisine,” friends would often say when they visited us in Mexico. “We want to experience the regional cuisines.”

Well, yes, it’s true that there are very significant differences between the cuisines of, say, southern and northern Mexico, the Gulf Coast and the central plateau.

There are, though, lots of similarities and overlaps in what people eat in these different regions. The tortillas are similar, there are always beans though of different kinds, there are always chiles, though of different kinds, the way of cooking rice is pretty uniform, and sauces are predominantly vegetable purees of combinations of chile, tomatillo, tomato, with a supporting garlic, onion, and coriander. Moreover, the centralized distribution system and the food processing industry mean that similar cuts of meat, varieties of vegetables, Knorr powdered caldo de pollo, Herdez pickled jalapeños, and Corona beer are available everywhere.

All of which is a roundabout way of saying that I continue to find the idea of regional cuisines perplexing. Recently I wrote about one cuisine in the United States that does seem to me distinctly regional–Hawaii’s Local Food–for Rob Shewfelt’s blog, In Defense of Processed Food.  I re-blog it here and add a bit of commentary.

Do regional cuisines really exist in the United States? asked Sandra Oliver in one of the last issues of Food History News, the newsletter she started in 1989 and published for twenty years. Was it not the case that until the end of the nineteenth century everyone depended on a porridge of pounded corn, called mush or grits?  And that with the industrialization of food, they switched to bread, so that what’s often called a regional cuisine consists of little more than a specific ingredient or dish: lobster in Maine, beignets in Louisiana, or smoked whitefish around the Great Lakes? It’s a question that is still open.

Except in Hawaii, that is. Hawaii has a regional cuisine, called Local Food in the Islands.

Created between the 1960s and the 1980s, Local Food is the matrix from which teriyaki, Hawaiian sweet bread, and the poke bowl now trending on the mainland emerged.

Even so, Local Food is largely invisible to the 9 million tourists who visit each year and unknown outside Hawaii.  Local Food was created by Locals—non-white inhabitants, often of mixed heritage, who had been born and raised in the Islands. They made up the majority of the Democratic Party that came to power when Hawaii became a state in 1959. Most of their ancestors had migrated to Hawaii sometime between the 1870s to the 1920s from south China, Japan, Okinawa, Korea, the Portuguese Azores in the Atlantic, Puerto Rico, the Philippines and elsewhere to work as indentured laborers on the sugar and pineapple plantations.

Local Food is shared at political events, eaten at lunch trucks, served in the university cafeterias, and enjoyed at garage parties, and beach picnics.

Local Food was layered over other existing cuisines in the Islands.

The first was Hawaiian cuisine created by the people from the south Pacific. As they paddled their outrigger canoes into the leeward shelter of the Islands around 400 AD after the two-thousand-mile voyage, their hearts must have lifted to see the clouds hovering over the mountains promising cool, fresh water. As they explored, though, the exhilaration perhaps turned to worry as they found little that was edible except fish, seaweed, a couple of seasonal berries high in the mountains, a fern with an edible root, and a number of species of flightless bird. Perhaps it was these birds, now all long gone, that sustained them while they established the dozen or so food plants, especially taro, they had carefully stowed on their canoes, and while their pigs, dogs and chickens multiplied.  As it was, the Hawaiians grew to a flourishing society of tens of thousands of people sustained by cooked, pounded taro (poi) and fish flavored with seaweed.

So things went until 1778 when Captain Cook landed in Hawaii. He and others following him—missionaries, drifters, whalers, sugar planters, managers, and factors–introduced Anglo-American cuisine to the Islands, with its bread and beef. The intermarried elite of Hawaiian nobility and wealthy Anglo-Americans scrambled to find crops they could export to earn money settling by the end of the nineteenth century on sugar, soon joined by pineapple.

To provide the hard labor, the elite of Hawaii scoured the world for indentured laborers.  Just as the Hawaiians and the Anglo-Americans had introduced the crops, techniques, and dishes to reproduce their own cuisine, so too did the Chinese, Japanese, Okinawans, Koreans, Portuguese and Filipinos. Taro paddies were converted to rice paddies, Japanese tuna boats went out over the reef, and the Portuguese built beehive-shaped bread ovens. Plantation stores, itinerant sellers, small farmers, mom and pop stores offered rice, fermented sauces, and a wide range of vegetables. By World War II, when many had left the plantations and moved to cities, small restaurants offered a wealth of (largely) Asian options.

Plate lunch Rachel Laudan

Then came Statehood. The former plantation workers, known by the then-dismissive term “Local” for people of color, voted for the Democratic Party and came to power, displacing the earlier political elite.

To demonstrate their cohesion, Local people sought out dishes that would appeal to all groups in the pot lucks that opened the legislative sessions, in the public lunches, and in the trucks that served plate lunch specials.

Everyone enjoyed rice so it became the staple in the Islands. Two scoops of rice with macaroni salad, and a meat that might be teriyaki beef (Japanese) or beef curry (Hawaiian) or kal bi (Korean) or chicken shoyu (Chinese) made up the plate lunch.

Favorite light meals were the manapua (Chinese steamed bun stuffed with pork) or the Spam musubi (Japanese rice with a nori—dried seaweed–wrap).

Nibbles might be dried octopus or one of the many, many kinds of crack seed (dried apricots or other fruit, salted and often with a liquorice flavoring).

Portuguese sausage was popular for breakfast, sweet bread and malasadas (Portuguese donuts), andagi (Okinawan donuts) and mochi (Japanese pounded sweet rice) for sweet treats.

Fruit punch and shave ice were favorite refreshers in the heat. With a beer, everyone enjoyed chunks of raw fish (poke) flavored with sea weed or soy.

In 1976, Local Food was so entrenched in the Islands that the owner of the first McDonald’s had to defy company policy and modify the menu—now standard practice but then for the first time—to include saimin (Chinese-Japanese noodle soup), rice, Portuguese sausage, and fruit punch.

This Local Food served to unite formerly disenfranchised peoples in the Islands. It gave them an identity distinct both from the former ruling elite and from the tourists who brought dollars but were understandably uninterested in anything about Hawaii that went beyond tropical bounty and smiling native Hawaiians welcoming them with their alohas and luaus.

Just like the pidgin (Hawaii Creole dialect) that Locals spoke, Local Food was a secret language that expressed the recent political, social and cultural history of the Islands.

Local Food, then, was not the result of any local bounty for Hawaii had none. It was not biologically local, nor agriculturally local but culturally local, the upshot of the unique pattern of migrants to the Islands and the circumstances that had brought some of them to political power.

Now the children of Locals are leaving the Islands in search of better job opportunities and a lower cost of living. Wealthy retirees from the mainland and Asia are moving in for the balmy weather and relaxing life style. Local Food may well be gone as fast as it arrived.

So a few points.

Local Food is the cuisine created by the unique set of peoples that landed up in the Hawaiian Islands.  It has little to do with the original fauna and flora of the Islands because almost none of this could be made edible. It has little to do with the agriculture of the Islands which was almost entirely given over to sugar and pineapple.  Thus Local Cuisine is a cultural phenomenon not one arising from the nature of the place.  I suspect most regional cuisines are cultural.

Local Food took shape in response to political change, in this case the sudden and rather unexpected rise to political power of former plantation workers.  I suspect that most regional cuisines arise at times of political change.  

Local Food was never the only cuisine in Hawaii, though it was for half a century the dominant public cuisine for those who lived in the Islands.  At the very least there were also Hawaiian, Cantonese, Okinawan, Japanese, Korean, Filipino, and mainland/Anglo cuisines. I suspect that most regional cuisines are not the only cuisines in their geographic region. 

Local Food is probably on the way out as the population and thus the politics of Hawaii changes.  This is not unusual.  I suspect many regional cuisines, indeed many cuisines, are quite short lived, and getting more so with increased migration. 

_______

I highly recommend Rob Shewfelt’s blog, In Defense of Processed Food. Rob is Professor Emeritus of Food Science and Technology at the University of Georgia and knows whereof he speaks. His recent review of Anna Zeide’s Canned: The Rise and Fall of Consumer Confidence in the Food Industry is a great place to start.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

2 thoughts on “What are regional cuisines? Reflections on Hawaii and other places

  1. waltzingaustralia

    Fascinating discussion. Loved Sandy Oliver’s insights — but yours, as well. (And fond memories of a first encounter with teriyaki in Hawaii 45 years ago.)

    Even in Europe of long ago, before the bounty of the Americas redefined the cuisines, food was pretty much food of the rich (exotic luxuries obtained by trade) and food of the poor (some grain, often pork, and whatever else was available locally). In ancient Rome, if you were rich, you were eating pretty much the same stuff, whether you were in Londinium or Palestina.

    And I know this isn’t news to you — you wrote the book on cuisine and culture. :)

    As for the development of regional foods in the U.S., a surprising number of “classic” regional foods were actually eaten by everyone at one time, and simply vanished in some places. (Pimento cheese is a good example of this. Once popular throughout the U.S., it is now considered a regional specialty of the South.) Regional cuisine wasn’t even discussed until cookbooks started becoming popular in the 20th century.

    So agreed with the concept that “regional” food is a combination of who showed up and what was available–even if “available” meant arriving by train or jet or outrigger. I think of the mid-1800s cookbooks from the Midwest, where oysters, lemons, and curry appear frequently in recipes — because trains made so much available, and there have always been people who wanted the exotic.

    It now seems that we are working at a faster rate than ever to alter and redefine food cultures, with fusion cuisines popping up everywhere — like the Middle Eastern tacos a friend found in France. And with Amazon trying to supply everything everywhere, one wonders what the word “regional” will even mean in a few years.

    1. Rachel Laudan Post author

      Thanks for the thoughts. You’ve thought a lot about the cuisine of the Midwest so glad to hear that you are in general agreement with this claim of mine.

I'd love to know your thoughts