August 29, 2010

Why the West Doesn’t Wet Grind. Update

The question, posed by Ken Albala.  Why doesn’t the “West” grind wet?  That is why didn’t they soak or boil grains before they ground them?

As a preliminary I would say that they would certainly have tried it.  If you look back at the past, everything that could be done to grains was: toasting, sprouting, soaking, boiling, adding alkali (and doubtless acids too), pounding, grinding, doing these things in diverse orders, fermenting the result, shaping the result.

Second preliminary.  People were very, very picky and knowledgeable about the result.  If you depend on grain (bread, tortillas, boiled rice, etc etc) for 80% of your calories you become a connoisseur of grain products.  We simply don’t match that knowledge.

Third preliminary.  Grinding and pounding sound simple but they were very sophisticated operations with dozens of variants depending on the species of grain, the variety of the species chosen, the age of the grain, the type of grindstone (dozens of shapes and materials of lateral grindstones alone) and the preliminary treatment of the grain before you started.

Fourth preliminary.  Our vocabulary is ridiculously restricted.  How many of us today can snap our fingers and explain the difference between meal and groats and grits and flour and grist and a whole complex vocabulary that varied from place to place and grain to grain. Just the word bread covers a world of products and that’s only the beginning.

Fifth preliminary.  This may all seem just too nerdy for words. But the fate of whole societies depended on how they ground.  Few things have had greater impact on the course of history.

Ken (his photo) tried soaking barley for a few days.

As Leni Sorensen and Adam Balic in the comments both point out, this will begin changing some of the starch to sugar, resulting in a sweeter result.   Here’s Leni’s description.

I have ground sprouted red wheat berries on my big Mexican matate – not the easiest – so I now resort to the food processor. Sprouted wheat with a two day tail makes a sweet sticky paste. I use it in my yeast bread but it also makes a great addition to flat breads and crackers. Yum!

Then Ken (his photo) pounded the barley in a large mortar for twenty minutes.

Ken’s description.

It was an odd red prairie barley I picked up at Corti Brothers in Sacramento, meant to be cooked like rice. So I have no idea how old, how far prepared or anything. They were not pearled like barley you buy for soup. More like a whole grain. And after pounding (just soaked, not cooked) it was a coarse dough. Which only really held together well after I added ground dry flour. SO maybe that’s why there’s not wet milling. You need dry flour too.

Ken didn’t photograph the final result but I suspect it was nothing like as finely divided as a ground grain dish would be.  And the hull (the tight seed coat) is not going to be broken into fine particles by pounding.  Shearing does a much better job than pounding at breaking up the seed coat and reducing the interior to tiny particles.

Here’s my tentative summary of the situation.

So Ken  pounded not sheared in your mortar. That is quicker and easier  than shearing because you can use the weight of arm plus pestle. But as the photo shows it does not produce flour just smashed… grains.

To get either smooth masa or a fine flour (not a very coarse meal) you have to shear. Shearing is almost impossible in a pestle and mortar if you want to produce flour in quantity because you are turning your wrist, tiring and not very forceful.

Maize nixtamalized can be ground to a smooth masa but only on a lateral grindstone, not a rotary one. You use the weight of the body.

Dry maize, wheat, barley etc can be ground to a smooth flour on a lateral (body weight at work, usually though not always) or a rotary grindstone (weight of the upper stone doing the work).

Wet wheat, barley etc (and I think wet, unnixtamalized maize) can be ground to a paste on a lateral grindstone but only with difficulty (thanks Leni).

Wet rice can be ground to a slurry (but not a paste) on a rotary grindstone (thanks Adam).  Pastes gum up rotary grindstones (which is why in Mexico there were two kinds of grinding, water mills for wheat and lateral grindstones for wet maize).

Wet or dry grains can be broken or flaked by pounding with a pestle and mortar.

____

A couple more thoughts.

1. Flour is pretty perishable which is why grains were stored whole, not as flour.  But wet pastes (masa) are much, much more perishable.  They don’t keep from one day to the next.  You have to have powerful reasons to want to grind wet.

2. Flour can be sifted through a cloth to remove all of part of the bran (the broken up seed coat).  This can’t be done with a paste (the coat of maize is rubbed off before grinding wet, having been broken up by the alkali used in nixtamalization).   Since people have always preferred finer, whiter breads, this was another advantage to flour.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Comments (13)


A Tarahumara mother encourages her hungry child

Only indirectly to do with food.

I’ve often wondered at the Mexican four and five year-olds (or younger) who trot along beside their mothers for mile after mile.  It induces what I call the “first class passenger syndrome.”  No sooner are you upgraded to first class because of your miles than it’s all too easy to start feeling that the people in second class are just plain different. So it’s all too easy to imagine that these children are just inured to long walks.

This delightful song from the Tarahumara of northern Mexico puts that idea to rest.   A mother encourages her hungry, footsore child on the long journey home over the mountains.  First in Tarahumara, then in English. Evocative photos.

towi_simi_nararachi

Need Powerpoint and it takes a few seconds to load.

Thanks to an unknown teacher in the area who wanted it better known. Forwarded by Beatriz Ramírez Woolrich.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Comments (2)


August 28, 2010

Why doesn’t the West grind wet like the Mexicans?

Grinding boiled wheat.
Here are a couple of questions from my food historian companion-in-arms, Ken Albala.
So why do people say you need wheat to make bread? This is about 80 percent barley, and the rest sourdough wheat starter. Rose nicely, though dense, and quite pungently sour. But this is SUCH luscious bread. Exactly what I was looking for.
Well surely people don’t say you need wheat to make bread.  All kinds of grains (rye, maize, oats, etc etc) were used to make bread, and it was stretched with peas, beans, potatoes, chestnuts, or, bark or clay if you were really pushed.  But if you wanted to rise a bit, then you need some wheat (or rye).  Which is precisely what you have here.
And here’s the weirdest part. I have no grain mill. Someday I want a rotary hand quern. Anyone know where to get one, has to be stone, please let me know. I never really wanted an electric flour mill – that’s the only reason I still don’t own one.
So I soaked the barley for a few days and hand ground the grains in my big stone mortar. No big deal. Not gritty in the least. I wonder why people in the past without mills didn’t do this. Much easier than dry grains. And of course with corn in MesoAmerica, this is exactly what they did. Why is there no wet milling for bread in the West??? I am perplexed.
I want a stone rotary quern too.
The short answer, Ken, is that wet ground wheat does not produce a nice paste, wet ground maize when nixtamilized does.  It produces disgusting little wormy shapes that are hard to deal with. See photo above.  Grinding it dry produces nice flour.  See photo below.  (You don’t say what you got in your mortar.  A paste?  Or a slurry which is easier).   And tellingly Mexicans don’t grind wheat wet.
But more thoughts.
1.  You are using a stone mortar which makes it possible to shear the grains (a mixture of lateral and vertical motions) which is what breaks up the hard kernel.  My impression is that many mortars in the Roman Empire, for example, were for pounding, as those marble ones you buy in gourmet shops are today for example.  This does not produce decent flour.
Yes, the Ancient World pounded grains but that was to get the husk off (your barley was presumably already husked).   So pounding de-husks, shearing grinds.  Lots of confusion about this because people don’t realize that different kinds of mortars do different things.
2.  You are making a tiny amount.  That’s what? a one-pound loaf?  Well, most people would have eaten two of those a day.  Shearing to produce a flour (or wet a paste) with a rotary motion of the wrist is not very efficient because you can’t apply much weight.  In grinding on a simple grindstone (lateral grindstone, metate) it’s the weight of the body that does the work.  Very hard work too.  In Mexico, mortars are never used for wet grinding grains, only for chiles and other easy-peasy jobs.  And even then, if you want to grind a lot of nuts, chiles, spices for mole for example you get out the metate which is both more efficient and produces a better result.
3.  So for serious grinding of grains, wet or dry, you use the lateral grindstone or metate.  I have tried wet grinding wheat with these, not a metate, but a grindstone in Minorca.  Quite a thrill since it was about 3000 years old.
The wheat was boiled not soaked.  And it did not produce a decent masa at all as the photo above shows.  The photo below shows what nice flour it produced when dry ground.
4.  Once you change to the rotary quern, as the “West” did in the early centuries AD, it gets worse.  Grinding wet just gums up between the stones and doesn’t flow out along the channels.
5.  Indians from the South of the Subcontinent also wet grind but not for bread making.  And that’s another whole story.  For another time.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Comments (7)